Wednesday
Jul072010

Free the Grid

PNM is traveling around New Mexico hosting public meetings, complete with cookies and coffee, to discuss the future of electricity in the state. This past Tuesday’s meeting at the Santa Fe Community College drew about 30 members of the public, and although I could only stomach the first hour, that was enough to reach an important conclusion: Investor-owned utility companies such as PNM will never provide community benefits. They simply can’t.

Inherently, many of us know that we should be angry at PNM. We sense that something isn’t right with them, even if we can’t finger exactly what it is. We think they should burn less coal, stop raising rates, and give their executives a pay cut. These issues surface at public meetings, and although they may be true, they distract us from a much larger realization.

The real problem with electric utilities is that their business practices are every bit as dangerous as Wall Street banks flying high on derivatives or multinational oil giants hooked on deepwater drilling. Electric utilities continue to build central power plants connected to interstate transmission corridors – a practice so dangerous that it has taken the world’s climate to the ragged edge of instability. And, like the bankers and the oil barrens, they do it because it solidifies their power and ensures that we will continue to depend on them.

The ability of the electric power system to inflict great harm on communities and the planet is well established, but it’s ability to do the opposite – to yield enormous benefits – has barely been explored.

The electric power system is little more than a network of wires, connecting us all together so that we can exchange energy. Ignore the fact, for the moment, that these exchanges currently consist of you writing checks to the world’s biggest polluters, and imagine instead the best possible scenario. Imagine that all of your neighbors have generators of various types and sizes, and whenever one of them has a little more than they need, they can share it with you the same way you might share vegetables from your garden. This kind of trading is not just efficient or economical – it’s the kind of exchange that builds community.

Now for the part that took me a long time to see:  There are no insurmountable challenges, technical or regulatory or otherwise, preventing us from operating our electric power system in ways that benefit communities. That’s not to say there aren’t challenges, but many of them have already been overcome. Denmark declared their entire network of wires to be a public asset dedicated to providing public benefits, and they gave every Danish citizen the right to generate electricity and use the wires to provide that electricity to others. The Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands showed that large numbers of distributed generators could interact in beneficial ways when connected to the electric network using a “plug-and-play” architecture similar to that used by the internet. So much of the heavy lifting needed to transform the grid has already been done.

Is the United States ready for a publicly owned power grid dedicated to public benefits? Mostly we still occupy ourselves with minutiae, setting standards for big, obsolete utilities and then requiring them to hold public meetings so that they can pretend to care about the communities and ecosystems they are busily destroying. But to paraphrase Al Sharpton, when asked whether America was ready for a black president, he shot back that Americans weren’t ready to let blacks sit down on the bus. But it didn’t matter, he said, because WE were ready.

So I guess the only question is, are we ready to free the grid?  I know I am. Won’t you join me?

Friday
Jun252010

Mark on Talk1260 KTRC Saturday

I will be on Kim Shanahan's "Green Building" radio show Saturday (today) at 1:00p talking about how to revolutionize the electric utility grid by creating municipal utilities, building active microgrid networks, and interfacing the electric grid with district heating grids. We will even talk a little about how the BP oil spill should be helping us put these plans in context. Let's get MOVING, people!

So tune in to KTRC 1260 AM on Saturday, and enjoy!

 

 

Tuesday
Jun152010

Mark on KUNM News, June 15, 2010

I was interviewed by Jim Williams on KUNM news tonight for a segment that aired right before Obama's address to the nation on oil disaster in the Gulf. Jim and I discussed the larger issues of corporate power that brought us to such a dangerous place, and how to get a handle on turning things around.

I hope you will listen to the segment and let me know what you think!

Tuesday
Jun152010

Obama's Address on Gulf Oil Falls Flat

Obama just gave his flattest speech ever in an address to the nation that was supposed to show us how tough he’s getting on oil companies. Instead he just tossed out a few military references, calling the disaster an “assault” and a “siege”, and referring to the oil slick as a “menacing cloud”. Then he repeated something BP had told him about how much oil they plan to capture by such and such time, and in a clear nod to BP’s legal team, he even used their catch-phrase about paying “legitimate claims”. What a chuckler that was, and obviously it will be fodder for Stewart and Colbert tomorrow.

As for what to expect going forward, Obama apologized to all those hurt by the 6-month drilling moratorium, but said we needed time to learn all the facts. (The House Energy Committee is actually doing a terrific job of this.) He advised that we need new technologies and precautions and standards, alongside better enforcement, in order to resume drilling, but the clear message to me was that we are doing our best to resume drilling. Damn the gusher wells, full speed ahead!

Obama did a pretty fair job explaining oil-resource degradation, announcing to the whole world that our oilfields are terribly depleted and explaining that it will continue to get more difficult for us to extract oil, but he countered this by saying that not meeting this challenge would be unacceptable and that discoveries “will someday lead to entire new industries”. It hard to imagine conveying less urgency than that, and the talk about how tough we are as a nation is sounding pretty thin at this point.

The speech was devoid of specifics except for things like how many National Guard troops have been deployed. He said that in order to accelerate the transition he would be open to ideas from either party, from which I gathered that any ideas independent of a major political affiliation are dead in the water.

Obama closed by saying that we needed faith and courage to meet the challenges we face, and that we should pray and remember that God is with us even during storms. Lovely sentiments, to be sure, but it seemed an odd time to deliver them. It was time to say that he would get us off this runaway train of corporate excesses, crack down on the power of energy multinationals, and re-empower communities to meet their energy needs with local, independent production. He missed that opportunity by a mile of deepwater.